Blogging on a Lobotomy: February 2008 Archives

"Liberal Values Blogging on a Lobotomy, when it comes to anything having to do with science or economics, takes the classic approach of the intellectually bankrupt and argues with ad hominem attackes and red herrings, just about every argument or point is smeared and dismissed as "right-wing talking points."

Well, if they are, they should be easy to counter -- but they aren't, so they're not, so -- Liberal Values Blogging on a Lobotomy smears them.

The only reason I'll be picking on "Liberal Values Blogging on a Lobotomy is 1) he is a very good blogger, i.e., he writes well on current events and 2) it's a very popular blog that many people read. But -- "Liberal Values Blogging on a Lobotomy (and it isn't the only one), is basically so partisan addicted that it's not really worth one's time to even try to argue or pose a question because "Liberal Values Blogging on a Lobotomy doesn't seem to know how to debate or how to really answer a question.

"Liberal Values Blogging on a Lobotomy isn't the only one because this is a lost art today. Very few people know how to debate and question and answer, but "Liberal Values Blogging on a Lobotomy is a textbook case of that failing, and offers an almost endless supply of perfect examples of this that can be addressed.

In the coming days, I'm going to try to address how ">Liberal Values Blogging on a Lobotomy tries, and fails, to come to grips with certain areas of (what LV likes to call) -- "reality." For the moment, however, I'll let Richard Drefuss lay out the broad principles that LV, others on the Left, and those who are addicted to partisan politics have either lost sight of -- or never learned in the first place: