Recently in Iraq Category

Five years ago, few predicted that the Iraq war would turn out this way (except for the thinkers at my favorite think tank: Cato called it all correctly even before the invasion)

The war's supporters, like Senator John McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee for president, issued endless false assurances to the American people before the war that 'we can win an overwhelming victory in a very short period of time.' Senator Hillary Clinton could not be bothered to read the National Intelligence Estimate on Iraq before voting to send U.S. troops into battle.

With the Ship Of State feeling more like the Titanic, no wonder people are grabbing onto Obama not realizing he's a leaky and unsteady lifeboat:

First, the fact is -- the Democratic party let us down. I've never voted Democrat before, but I did durning the midterm elections because I was troubled by the growth in government spending and -- frankly -- pissed off and fed up with the Iraq war. John Kerry and the Democratic party talked a good game and seem to be a light at the end of a very long and very dark tunnel.

In his final State of the Union address, President Bush predictably made the case for an open-ended military presence in Iraq, probably for decades. Bush has previously invoked Korea as a model and his administration hopes to conclude a formal status of forces agreement (SOFA) with the Iraqi government that would effectively tie his successor's hands in ever getting us out of Iraq.

Christopher A. Preble, director of foreign policy studies at the Cato Institute, puts it this way:

What a dramatic change from one year ago, when the president claimed that the surge would facilitate political reconciliation that would enable U.S. forces to come home. But the reduction in violence has not contributed to national reconciliation, and the president now argues that we cannot withdraw below pre-surge levels lest Iraq fall back into chaos. Approximately 130,000 American troops will remain in Iraq, roughly the same number as when the surge was first announced.

We cannot know how long it will take for Iraqi politicians to take responsibility for their country, or even whether they will do so. Given their many past failures, there is little reason for optimism. In the meantime, while Iraq's politicians dither, and our troops are risking their lives every day, we hope that the lull in violence continues. But this much is certain: President George W. Bush launched a war of choice in March 2003 that has so far cost the lives of nearly 4,000 Americans, and left many thousands more with life-altering injuries. The venture has cost American taxpayers more than $500 billion, and the meter is running at a rate of $10 billion a month. It will be up to the next president to clean up the mess.

Looking back, it's almost farcical how it all started, and how it would have been so easy to prevent: Back in 2003 or 2004, former counter-terrorism czar Richard Clarke talked to Lesley Stahl on 60 Minutes about the Bush administration's neocon obsession with Iraq: